Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 1 Analysis using the LDLVP method: calculated x MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaadaGcaaqaaiabdIha4bWcbeaaaaa@2E40@ and p-values as a result of Bonferroni correction for sham and microwave exposed (MW) conditions in P-channels (significant marked bold).

From: Methods of electroencephalographic signal analysis for detection of small hidden changes

  x MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaadaGcaaqaaiabdIha4bWcbeaaaaa@2E40@ p – value
Subject sham MW sham MW
1 0.07 0.95 1.000 0.591
2 -0.11 -3.02 0.582 0.025
3 1.02 1.30 1.000 0.392
4 0.81 -0.21 0.876 0.835
5 0.67 -0.39 0.963 0.812
6 0.81 -0.28 0.844 0.838
7 0.98 -0.63 0.837 0.802
8 -1.23 -1.51 0.804 0.315
9 1.86 3.69 0.715 0.022
10 -0.28 2.49 0.769 0.065
11 0.88 0.46 1.000 0.816
12 0.00 3.09 1.000 0.029
13 -0.04 1.93 1.000 0.170
14 -1.30 -3.69 1.000 0.011
15 1.93 0.49 1.000 0.857