Skip to main content

Table 1 Analysis using the LDLVP method: calculated x MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaadaGcaaqaaiabdIha4bWcbeaaaaa@2E40@ and p-values as a result of Bonferroni correction for sham and microwave exposed (MW) conditions in P-channels (significant marked bold).

From: Methods of electroencephalographic signal analysis for detection of small hidden changes

 

x MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaadaGcaaqaaiabdIha4bWcbeaaaaa@2E40@

p – value

Subject

sham

MW

sham

MW

1

0.07

0.95

1.000

0.591

2

-0.11

-3.02

0.582

0.025

3

1.02

1.30

1.000

0.392

4

0.81

-0.21

0.876

0.835

5

0.67

-0.39

0.963

0.812

6

0.81

-0.28

0.844

0.838

7

0.98

-0.63

0.837

0.802

8

-1.23

-1.51

0.804

0.315

9

1.86

3.69

0.715

0.022

10

-0.28

2.49

0.769

0.065

11

0.88

0.46

1.000

0.816

12

0.00

3.09

1.000

0.029

13

-0.04

1.93

1.000

0.170

14

-1.30

-3.69

1.000

0.011

15

1.93

0.49

1.000

0.857